Re: Re: Windows Mobile build, memory allocation

Which version of VS, and which version of Windows Mobile are they for?

There are already build configs for Windows Mobile 5 in the repository 
for all the xiph libraries.

If you have configs for the old PPC's, let me know and/or send me the 
project files and i'll put them in the repository.

There's also a directshow(for Windows Media Player on WM5 devices) 
release just waiting to be tested some more before release for vorbis, 
speex and theora in case you are interested.

Zen.

Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 11:34 +0530, Ashhar Farhan wrote:
>   
> > I have sent the visual studio project files that compile the speex
> > client to jean-marc directly (as an attachment), sometime this week, I
> > will also upload the binary builds of static library files to my site
> > www.phonestack.com.
> >     
>
> Actually, Zen (illi on IRC) is the one handling the Windows stuff. I
> can't do anything with that (I've never even compiled Speex on
> Windows). 
>
>   
> > I am porting our LTP (lightweight telephony protocol) to some embedded
> > systems. I require to run speex in an environment that doesn't support
> > memory allocations. How difficult is it to convert speex_encoder_init
> > and speex_decoder_init to use preallocated memory buffers (presumably
> > passed by the initilisatio functions themselves)?
> >     
>
> All you need to do is override some of the functions in misc.c. You
> should need to touch anything else.
>
>         Jean-Marc
>
>   
> > - farhan
> >
> >
> > - farhan
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: speex-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:speex-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of Gervase Markham
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 2:55 AM
> > To: Jean-Marc Valin
> > Cc: speex
> > Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Library split (poll)
> >
> >
> > Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> >     
> > > In the 1.1.x branch, I've kept adding more stuff to libspeex: 
> > > preprocessor, AEC, etc. I'm now considering moving all those to a 
> > > separate library (libvoip, libspeech, whatever). Anyone on this list 
> > > has good reasons I should consider for either splitting or not 
> > > splitting libspeex?
> > >       
> > I'd argue for a separate library; in space-constrained environments, it
> > would be good to be able to easily not include these additional
> > features.
> >
> > Gerv
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speex-dev mailing list
> > Speex-dev@xxxxxxxx http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
> >
> >
> >     
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev@xxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
>
>