|
Re: VOTE: WS-Fx and Sandesha proposals: msg#00039apache.webservices.general
There was an Interop for WS-RM (http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/3901) and AFAIK no one was asked to get a license for doing an implementation. So it should be ok. Thanks, dims --- Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Aleksander Slominski" <aslom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > however how are IP issues resolved for WS-ReliableMessaging from > > http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-rm/ > > > > it is not clear to me if WS-RM can be implemented as open source? > > Hmm. Good question. > > Glen, when Sonic implemented WS-RM did you need a license from IBM > etc.? I can certainly get whatever is needed I believe; just need > to know what we need. > > Dims, does Apache need anything specific to make it "safe"? > > Sanjiva. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: pmc-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > For additional commands, e-mail: pmc-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: VOTE: WS-Fx and Sandesha proposals: 00039, Sanjiva Weerawarana |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: VOTE: WS-Fx and Sandesha proposals: 00039, Davanum Srinivas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: VOTE: WS-Fx and Sandesha proposalsi: 00039, Sanjiva Weerawarana |
| Next by Thread: | WS-RM open source impl and NDA [Re: VOTE: WS-Fx and Sandesha proposals]: 00039, Aleksander Slominski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |