|
Re: [OTish] Version Control?: msg#00656apache.mod-perl
At 03:21 PM 10/30/02 -0800, siberian@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >We check in all of our perl modules into CVS and its a >_MAJOR_ life saver. Keeps everyone on the same path so to >speak. I think I confused two different things: perl module source vs. installed modules. Do you check in the source or the installed modules? I keep the source of my perl modules under cvs, but not the perl library i.e. the files generated from make install, which might include binary components. I use a PREFIX for my own modules, but I tend to install CPAN modules in the main perl library. My own modules get installed in the application directory tree so that there's still a top level directory for the entire application/site. It does worry me that I'll update a CPAN module (or Apache::*) in the main Perl library and break something some day. (Although on things like updating mod_perl I have copied /usr/local/lib/perl5 before make install.) -- Bill Moseley mailto:moseley@xxxxxxxx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: [OTish] Version Control?: 00656, Jesse Erlbaum |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: DBD::Oracle/Windows2000 OK from prompt, not mod_perl?: 00656, Larry Leszczynski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OTish] Version Control?i: 00656, siberian |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OTish] Version Control?: 00656, Ask Bjoern Hansen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |