|
Re: Yahoo is moving to PHP ??: msg#00593apache.mod-perl
--- Perrin Harkins <perrin@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Mithun Bhattacharya wrote: > > >http://public.yahoo.com/~radwin/talks/yahoo-phpcon2002.htm > They also say they plan to continue using lots of perl in all the > places > they use it now: off-line processing, filling in the includes and dbm > > files that the server-side script assembles. Perl is not being > removed. No it is not being removed but this could have been a very big thing for mod_perl. Can someone find out more details as to why PHP was preferred over mod_perl it cant be just on a whim. I might be biased but considering the fact that PHP and mod_perl were neck to neck the cons should have made up for any slipup in performance. Also how does one go about justifying the fact that Ioncube cache is doing a better cacheing than any mod_perl based solution ?? I am assuming when Yahoo did their research they optimized everything to the maximum possible they werent out to do a marketting propaganda now were they .... Mithun __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Quota module for Perl: 00593, Peter Kehl |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Same $dbh under different pids?: 00593, harm |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Yahoo is moving to PHP ??i: 00593, Perrin Harkins |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Yahoo is moving to PHP ??: 00593, Jeff AA |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |