|
FW: silent failure still a problem in mod_perl 2.0?: msg#00315apache.mod-perl
Kyle Dawkins writes: > I'd betcha your problem is almost certainly caused by your use of DSOs. If > you *really* want to prune your system down to see where your bug is, then > build apache and mod_perl statically. There was a very well-known bug that > caused DBI to segfault if it was run under a DSO. Please rebuild your > binary and then let us know if that was the problem. I just ran into the silent-failure problem again today, when a sysadmin unknowingly upgraded glibc underneath mod_perl built as a DSO. Unfortunately, it was on a production system; fortunately, it was not on a very important production system, and rebuilding the tools fixed the problem. In anticipation of the postmortem meeting, I'm trying to find out if this problem still exists in mod_perl 2.0. Websearches have been fruitless; any pe[a]rls of wisdom from the list? Charlton |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | silent failure still a problem in mod_perl 2.0?: 00315, Wilbur, Charlton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fwd: Re: Apache::DBI as a prerequisite: 00315, Stas Bekman |
| Previous by Thread: | silent failure still a problem in mod_perl 2.0?i: 00315, Wilbur, Charlton |
| Next by Thread: | re: solaris 2.6, mod_perl 1.27, apache 1.3.26, resulting server fails: 00315, John E. Mendenhall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |