Re: Problems with mod_perl 1.12 (?) and ActivePerl 5.8.1

On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:20:57 -0800, Stas Bekman <stas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I suppose Randy simply used the cvs version to make this build.

Yeah, well, the problem is that now there's no 1.99_11 binary on
Winnipeg :( :)

> In fact what happened is that I started to port Apache::Status to mp2, but 
> was 
> distracted by other issues and never had a chance to complete it. It's almost 
> completed though.

Hmm... ActivePerl 5.8.0 and mod_perl 1.99_11 worked flawlessly. ??

> I reported it to p5p and CC'ed you.

Yeah, thanks.

> p.s. though it wasn't needed for this report as I was able to reproduce the 
> problem, in the future bug reports please follow: 
> http://perl.apache.org/bugs/. Thanks.

Will do. Thanks for the prompt response.

                                                           /L/e/k/t/u