Re: [mp2] one more issue with tracing on win32

Randy Kobes wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
> > I've noticed from your reports that the tracing has more
> > problems: it doesn't report the function name.
>
> [ .. ]
>
> > there is no way to get the name of the currently executed
> > function on win32?
>
>
> There's not a __FUNCTION__ macro with VC++ 6 - one has been
> added in VC++ 7, I believe.

Thanks Randy. Which version do you use to produce the binaries? IF 7, may be 
it's worth to have another ifdef to use it?

> In such cases where it doesn't exist, might it be
> useful to report instead the __LINE__ and __FILE__?

IMHO, it'll generate too much output, since the paths/filenames would be too 
long, making the trace not so useful. Or can you just show the __FILE__ w/o 
the path?


__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@xxxxxxxxxx http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com