Re: [patch] optional exports from Apache::TestUtil

Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > > and I didn't get the impression these three were private functions - 
> > > they're in the Apache::TestUtil manpage :)
> >
> >
> >
> > Should we s/^/t_/ as the others?
>
>
> yeah, I thought about why they were different, and figured that was the 
> reason those three weren't in the export list.  that they were 
> documented made me think it was just an oversight.
>
> I suppose for consistency we could change them, though we need to be 
> careful about where else they are used throughout the perl-framework. 
>  and because they are documented, in changing the name we're breaking 
> back compat for anyone using them currently.
>
> maybe alias the old names as a migration measure?

I can check and fix any uses in the perl-framework, but I don't think there 
are used. In any case Apache::Test wasn't released yet, so any API changes are 
OK, IMHO.

__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@xxxxxxxxxx http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com