On May 14, 2007, at 12:40 AM, Jitendra Kharche wrote:
Hi Curt,
So what do you suggest me to use in place of log4cxx 0.9.7 so that my
application has no impact.
If you have been using log4cxx 0.9.7 for a prolonged period of time
and have not been running into any other the other issues, then your
best course of action may be to research the bug in log4cxx 0.9.7
yourself and fix it in a local copy. However, as development has
moved far away from point, there is no benefit to the community for
someone to volunteer to debug it for you.
If you are just getting started, I would suggest building log4cxx
from the Subversion repository or downloading a nightly snapshot from
http://littletux.homelinux.org/log4cxx/. Both of these are really
close to what would be in log4cxx 0.10.0.
Thanks Arnold.
I am using both log4cxx (v0.9.7) and log4j (v1.2.8).
RollingFileAppender
works fine with log4j but not with log4cxx (with the similar
configuration).
I will try with changes you suggested. But I am not able to find any
package named 'org.apache.log4j.rolling' both in the log4j jar as
well
as the c++ distribution. So I am wondering how will it work.
Please help.
org.apache.log4j.rolling.RollingFileAppender was introduced in the
log4j 1.3 development. If you are using log4j 1.2.8 and rolling is
working for you, then your configuration file is almost certainly
using org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender. The current log4cxx code
base should support both org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender and
org.apache.log4j.rolling.RollingFileAppender with exactly the same
format as log4j. (log4cxx-0.9.7 required you to change the date
format specifiers).
|
