Curt Arnold wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2006, at 4:15 AM, Efri Nattel-Shay wrote:
>
>> A couple of questions about the SyslogAppender:
>>
>>
>>
>> Any reason for the duplication of HAVE_SYSLOG and
>> LOG4CXX_HAVE_SYSLOG? The former exists in the makes, the latter is in
>> the sources itself. The sources used to have HAVE_SYSLOG (e.g. rev.
>> 308539), but it was changed
>
>
> I'll let Andreas answer that one.
I have to check it. I remember that I worked on this when I ported
the datagram socket to APR, but I dont remember the reason for
the modified #define.
>> I would like to use the "local" syslog functionality, so I just
>> #defined LOG4CXX_HAVE_SYSLOG, and the ::syslog() part was
>> successfully used. I see that the "non-
>> local" writer is commented – should I be worried? J
See https://issues.apache.org:443/jira/browse/LOGCXX-66
I wanted to continue working on this, once I have committed the stuff which
I worked on recently :-)
> All the existing network stuff needed to be rewritten due to the move
> to APR. Looks nobody has taken on that part yet.
>
>> And another quick one –
>>
>> Is there an existing RPM spec file log4cxx somewhere?
See also https://issues.apache.org:443/jira/browse/LOGCXX-20
Andreas
|
