In fact, I get
into trouble when I run ./autogen.sh. So it must none of business of the
compiler. Maybe it's caused by the lack of some necessary application (or they
do not work properly). But what may be it? I am confused.
Bill
David
2004.10.18
-----Original Message-----
From:
renny.koshy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:renny.koshy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004
9:50 PM
To: Log4CXX User
Cc: carnold@xxxxxxxxxx;
cdevienne@xxxxxxxxxx; log4cxx-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
mcatan@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Help: I find it's too hard to build
log4cxx on Solaris.
I'm surprised.... I followed the
directions, and it built without any problems on the first try...
Solaris 8 (Intel/Sparc)... of course I"m using Forte compilers...
Renny Koshy
President &
CEO
--------------------------------------------
RUBIX Information
Technologies, Inc.
www.rubixinfotech.com
|
| "Xiong, Wei (Wei)"
<wxiong@xxxxxxxxxx>
10/15/2004 06:04 AM
Please respond to "Log4CXX User"
|
To:
log4cxx-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc:
mcatan@xxxxxxxxxx, carnold@xxxxxxxxxx,
cdevienne@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Help: I find
it's too hard to build log4cxx on
Solaris. |
Hi, Everybody,
I want to have a study on log4cxx 0.9.7. But I
find it's too hard to build
log4cxx on Solaris. I don't know why the
authors do not publish a ordinary
configure or makefile, but I think many
programmers including me will be
very appreciated if they do so.
I
follow the INSTALL guide and run ./autogen.sh on my Solaris 9 x86. But
many
errors occur and stop me from try log4cxx. The following is the
output:
david@billdavid>./autogen.sh
/usr/local/share/aclocal/cppunit.m4:4:
warning: underquoted definition of
AM_PATH_CPPUNIT
run info
'(automake)Extending aclocal'
or see
http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal
configure.in:32:
/usr/local/bin/m4: ERROR: Reading inserted file: No such
file or
directory
autom4te: /usr/local/bin/m4 failed with exit status:
1
aclocal: autom4te failed with exit status: 1
autoheader: error:
AC_CONFIG_HEADERS not found in configure.in
configure.in:21: error:
possibly undefined macro: AM_CONFIG_HEADER
If this
token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation.
configure.in:27: error: possibly
undefined macro: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
configure.in:32: error: possibly
undefined macro: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
configure.in:86: error: possibly undefined
macro: AM_CONDITIONAL
configure.in: no proper invocation of
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE was found.
configure.in: You should verify that
configure.in invokes AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE,
configure.in: that aclocal.m4 is
present in the top-level directory,
configure.in: and that aclocal.m4 was
recently regenerated (using aclocal).
configure.in: installing
`./install-sh'
configure.in: installing `./missing'
docs/Makefile.am:6:
DOC does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
docs/Makefile.am:22: LATEX_DOC does
not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
examples/Makefile.am: installing
`./depcomp'
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am: am__fastdepCXX
does not appear
in
AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am: AMDEP does not
appear in
AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am:
am__fastdepCXX does not appear
in
AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am: AMDEP does not
appear in
AM_CONDITIONAL
src/Makefile.am:1: Libtool library used but
`LIBTOOL' is undefined
src/Makefile.am:1:
src/Makefile.am:1: The usual
way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add
`AC_PROG_LIBTOOL'
src/Makefile.am:1:
to `configure.in' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf'
again.
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am: am__fastdepCXX does not
appear
in AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am:
AMDEP does not appear in
AM_CONDITIONAL
tests/Makefile.am:4: TESTS does
not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
tests/src/Makefile.am:6: TESTS does not appear
in AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am:
am__fastdepCXX does not appear
in
AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am: AMDEP does not
appear in
AM_CONDITIONAL
tests/src/customlogger/Makefile.am:4: TESTS
does not appear
in
AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am:
am__fastdepCXX does not appear
in
AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am: AMDEP does not
appear in
AM_CONDITIONAL
tests/src/defaultinit/Makefile.am:3: TESTS does
not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am:
am__fastdepCXX does not appear
in
AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am: AMDEP does not
appear in
AM_CONDITIONAL
tests/src/helpers/Makefile.am:3: TESTS does not
appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am:
am__fastdepCXX does not appear
in
AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am: AMDEP does not
appear in
AM_CONDITIONAL
tests/src/net/Makefile.am:4: TESTS does not
appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am:
am__fastdepCXX does not appear
in
AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am: AMDEP does not
appear in
AM_CONDITIONAL
tests/src/pattern/Makefile.am:4: TESTS does not
appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am:
am__fastdepCXX does not appear
in
AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am: AMDEP does not
appear in
AM_CONDITIONAL
tests/src/util/Makefile.am:4: TESTS does not
appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am:
am__fastdepCXX does not appear
in
AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am: AMDEP does not
appear in
AM_CONDITIONAL
tests/src/varia/Makefile.am:3: TESTS does not
appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am:
am__fastdepCXX does not appear
in
AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am: AMDEP does not
appear in
AM_CONDITIONAL
tests/src/xml/Makefile.am:4: TESTS does not
appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am:
am__fastdepCXX does not appear
in
AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/local/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am: AMDEP does not
appear in
AM_CONDITIONAL
I do not know well about autoconf, so I
don't know how to solve this
problem.
I have installed the following
programs on my computer:
GNU m4 1.4.1
autoconf (GNU Autoconf)
2.59
automake (GNU automake) 1.9.1
gcc 3.4.2
(GNU libtool)
1.5.10
cppunit 1.10.2
libxml2 2.6.4 (I found it need libxml2 when I try
to write a makefile for
it, so I installed it)
I don't know if they are
enough to build log4cxx.
I tried to write a makefile and added a
config_auto.h by myself. I
successfully build the .a file, but when I
compile the following program, I
failed.
// My program
#include
<log4cxx/logger.h>
#include
<log4cxx/basicconfigurator.h>
#include
<log4cxx/helpers/exception.h>
#include
<log4cxx/propertyconfigurator.h>
#include
<log4cxx/xml/domconfigurator.h>
#include
<log4cxx/helpers/loglog.h>
using namespace log4cxx;
using
namespace log4cxx::helpers;
using namespace log4cxx::xml;
LoggerPtr
logger = Logger::getLogger(_T("MyApp"));
class Bar
{
static log4cxx::LoggerPtr logger;
public:
void doIt();
};
LoggerPtr Bar::logger =
Logger::getLogger(_T("MyApp"));
void Bar::doIt()
{
logger->debug(_T("Did it again!"));
}
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int result =
EXIT_SUCCESS;
try
{
DOMConfigurator::configure(argv[1]);
logger->info(_T("Entering application."));
Bar bar;
bar.doIt();
logger->info(_T("Exiting application."));
}
catch(Exception&)
{
result =
EXIT_FAILURE;
}
return
result;
}
// build
david@billdavid>make -f log4cxx.mak
g++
-g -o log4cxxtest
-I../research/log4cxx-0.9.7/include
-L../research/log4cxx-0.9.7/lib
-llog4cxx log4cxxtest.cpp
log4cxxtest.cpp:10: error: expected
namespace-name before ';' token
log4cxxtest.cpp:10: error: `<type
error>' is not a namespace
log4cxxtest.cpp: In function `int main(int,
char**)':
log4cxxtest.cpp:37: error: `DOMConfigurator' has not been
declared
log4cxxtest.cpp:37: error: `configure' undeclared (first use this
function)
log4cxxtest.cpp:37: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
reported only once
for
each function it appears in.)
make: *** [all]
Error 1
How could gcc can't parse the line 10:
using namespace
log4cxx::xml;
I am puzzled.
(notes: I build the above program on Windows
successfully and get the right
result.)
Eager for any help from
anyone who saw this mail. Thank you.
Bill David
Oct. 15
2004
| 
