Re: Question about softupgrade mode ..

Hello.

Just problem of my ability of English ....

> I think it is better to take the extra time up
> front to address the issue in the best way.

What does "extra time up front" mean ?
It seems to have some meaning of  period of time ...
Is this a set phrase which have special meaning in project ?


> > If it makes it easier, I personally, think that it would be fine to add
> > another column  using the same model as the other autoincrement
> > information.  Then,  they all can be rolled into DefaultInfo later as
> > part of a separate cleanup task.
>
> I think adding extra information to the DefaultInfo is the correct way
> and is the way the system was designed. The column's definition is
> through the interface DefaultInfo, thus allowing different object
> implementations to be stored in the column, representing additional
> information as needed.

Thinking freely in these days,
I came to thought it would be worth to rollback to first phase of desicion 
aboout solution1-3.

As you know, we have three solution.
Implementing for solution-1, we found there exists barrier in implementation 
of DefaultInfo.
Then , it would be worth to think about solution-2 and solution-3.


Best regards.



/*

        Tomohito Nakayama
        tomonaka-w3tBFbkRwq9dvEbG9P4ZtA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        tomohito-3vbGXx/L6hogx5LJoh7VlA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

        Naka
        http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html

*/
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Daniel John Debrunner" <djd-elHr7NBI3VpYzD5mSbZInQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Derby Development" <derby-dev-PvNy6fhA98DNLxjTenLetw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: Question about softupgrade mode ..


> Kathey Marsden wrote:
>
> > TomohitoNakayama wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Now, I came to thought changing DefaultInfo have more impact than
> > > adding column to SYSCOLUMNS table ....
> > > //I wishes that DefaultInfo existed in either case of autoinrement and
> > > default !!!
> > >
> > > Thinking the autoincrement is one kind of default, I think approach of
> > > adding attributes of autoincrement to DefaultInfo is not bad.
> > > However , thinking impact of that modification, I think I MUST be at a
> > > loss correctly and find the answer for that.
> >
> >
> > If it makes it easier, I personally, think that it would be fine to add
> > another column  using the same model as the other autoincrement
> > information.  Then,  they all can be rolled into DefaultInfo later as
> > part of a separate cleanup task.
>
> I think adding extra information to the DefaultInfo is the correct way
> and is the way the system was designed. The column's definition is
> through the interface DefaultInfo, thus allowing different object
> implementations to be stored in the column, representing additional
> information as needed.
>
> Adding a system column with the intention of removing it later as
> cleanup just seems wrong, I think it is better to take the extra time up
> front to address the issue in the best way.
>
> Dan.
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.4 - Release Date: 2005/04/27



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.4 - Release Date: 2005/04/27