RE: [vote] Re-vote for Derby docs in DITA

I think that the DITA adoption would be furthered if each site or
project that does adopt DITA offers a LDP style HOW-TO

Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: James Eacret 
[mailto:james.eacret-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 3:39 PM
To: Derby Development
Subject: Re: [vote] Re-vote for Derby docs in DITA


+1


On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:31:31 -0800, Andrew McIntyre
<mcintyre.a-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:01:00 -0800 (PST), Jeff Levitt
> <derby-+okm4nUr24tWk0Htik3J/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > [ ] +1: Approve DITA adoption
> 
> +1!
> 
> After my first foray into Forrest and working with (and building) the
> Derby website, I am very much in favor of this, as Forrest's
> performance on the hundreds of HTML files that currently constitute
> our manuals leaves more than a little something to be desired.
> 
> I also find it much easier to search through single-page HTML docs for
> specific items, and having clean, printable PDFs is icing on the cake,
> for sure.
> 
> andrew
>