Re: portability

Friedrich Dominicus wrote:
> This may sound a bit ridicolous, however I wonder how serious you are
> about the portability of the code used for libapr. Is it wanted that
> compiler/llibrary internals of specific compilers are used? Or is that
> considered a bug?

It needs to be portable ;-)

Seriously, if you have some way to make something a bazillion times 
faster by using a gcc extension then I suppose it might be considered, 
but you'd also have to provide a non-gcc version of the code for cases 
where that wasn't possible.  People compile APR with all sorts of 
compilters.

-garrett