Re: renaming apr_file_open_flags group defines

[don't forget to Reply-All]

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 05:02 PM 9/19/2004, you wrote:
>
> > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > Not sure what's the best prefix here. Is APR_OPEN_ good? APR_OPEN_READ, 
> > > > APR_OPEN_WRITE, ...
> >
> > > About this group - smakes sense to me unless these flags are 'generic',
> > > e.g. apply-to other.  And no, APR_OPEN_ isn't ideal, but APR_FILE_OPEN_
> > > would be. 
> >
> > So now that the veto has been removed, what's the best prefix to use? 
> > APR_FILE_OPEN_? APR_FOPEN_? other?
>
>
> There is no such apr_open_* today, so that would be wrong.
>
> APR_FILE_OPEN_* is right.  But I'm not seeing anyone but you and I
> advocating for it.

FILE_OPEN_ is inconsistent with other file defines. It's usually FFOO, as 
in FINFO, so APR_FOPEN_ makes more sense, IMHO



--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@xxxxxxxxxx http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com