|
|
September 29, 2003
- Re: Tagged 2.0, The Doctor
- [PATCH] move APR_INADDR_NONE definition, Joe Orton
- RE: Tagged 2.0, Brad Nicholes
- Re: cvs commit: apr configure.in Makefile.in, Joe Orton
- Re: problem building apr on darwin, Jeff Trawick
- Re: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_pools.c, Branko Čibej
- Re: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_pools.c, Cliff Woolley
- RE: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_pools.c, Sander Striker
- Re: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_pools.c, Branko Čibej
- RE: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_pools.c, Sander Striker
- Re: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_pools.c, Branko Čibej
- Re: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_pools.c, Branko Čibej
- RE: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_pools.c, Sander Striker
- Re: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_pools.c, Branko Čibej
September 25, 2003
- RE: segfault in apr_atomic_cas, Sander Striker
- Re: [doc patch] clarify the issue with uniqueness of the key in apr_pool_userdata_set, Stas Bekman
- Re: segfault in apr_atomic_cas, Stas Bekman
- Re: [doc patch] clarify the issue with uniqueness of the key in apr_pool_userdata_set, Cliff Woolley
- [doc patch] clarify the issue with uniqueness of the key in apr_pool_userdata_set, Stas Bekman
- [STATUS] (apr-util) Wed Sep 24 23:46:31 EDT 2003, Rodent of Unusual Size
- [STATUS] (apr) Wed Sep 24 23:45:38 EDT 2003, Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: segfault in apr_atomic_cas, William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: segfault in apr_atomic_cas, Stas Bekman
- Re: segfault in apr_atomic_cas, Blair Zajac
September 12, 2003
- RE: pool interface for shared memory?, Cliff Woolley
- Re: pool interface for shared memory?, Aaron Bannert
- RE: pool interface for shared memory?, Sander Striker
- Re: pool interface for shared memory?, Chris Knight
- Re: pool interface for shared memory?, Aaron Bannert
- Re: remove nested mutexes?, Wan-Teh Chang
- pool interface for shared memory?, Chris Knight
- RE: remove nested mutexes?, Sander Striker
- Re: remove nested mutexes?, Greg Stein
- Re: remove nested mutexes?, Aaron Bannert
- Re: remove nested mutexes?, Aaron Bannert
- Re: remove nested mutexes?, Greg Stein
- remove nested mutexes?, Aaron Bannert
September 07, 2003
- Re: apr_global_mutex_child_init & mod_watch, Jeff Trawick
- Re: apr_global_mutex_child_init & mod_watch, Anthony Howe
- Re: apr_global_mutex_child_init & mod_watch, Günter Knauf
- Re: apu build broken on win32, Cliff Woolley
- Re: apu build broken on win32, André Malo
- Re: apr_global_mutex_child_init & mod_watch, Jeff Trawick
- Re: Underage drinkers read, Cliff Woolley
- Underage drinkers read, jc
- Re: apr_global_mutex_child_init & mod_watch, Jeff Trawick
- apr_global_mutex_child_init & mod_watch, Anthony Howe
- Bug report for APR [2003/09/07], bugzilla
- Re: APR/64-Bit, Jeff Trawick
September 05, 2003
- Re: [patch] sendfile on win32 slow (bug #20382), Maarten Bekers
- Re: [patch] sendfile on win32 slow (bug #20382), Bill Stoddard
- [rfc] APRize tool (skeleton generator like apxs), Hiroyuki OYAMA
- Re: [patch] sendfile on win32 slow (bug #20382), Maarten Bekers
- Re: [proposal for 1.0 API] axe apu_compat.h and apr_compat.h?, Thom May
- Re: Problem avoiding memory leak with thread creation, Cliff Woolley
- Problem avoiding memory leak with thread creation, Chris Fallin
- Re: remaining issues prior to 1.0?, William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [patch] sendfile on win32 slow (bug #20382), William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [proposal for 1.0 API] axe apu_compat.h and apr_compat.h?, William A. Rowe, Jr.
September 03, 2003
- Re: stable branches created for apr and apr-util, time to get api tweaks in prior to 1.0, Cliff Woolley
- [PATCH] apr_reslist - allow Soft/Hard Max to Equal the Minimum, Paul Querna
- [PATCH] apr_reslist - allow Soft/Hard Max to Equal the Minimum, Paul Querna
- Re: [PATCH] apr_reslist - allow Soft/Hard Max to Equal the Minimum, Aaron Bannert
- Re: stable branches created for apr and apr-util, time to get api tweaks in prior to 1.0, Jeff Trawick
- Re: remaining issues prior to 1.0?, Joe Orton
- Re: [patch] sendfile on win32 slow (bug #20382), Bill Stoddard
- Re: remaining issues prior to 1.0?, Stas Bekman
- Re: remaining issues prior to 1.0?, Stas Bekman
- Re: remaining issues prior to 1.0?, Cliff Woolley
- Re: remaining issues prior to 1.0?, Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] check NULL in apr_bucket_alloc, Cliff Woolley
September 02, 2003
- stable branches created for apr and apr-util, time to get api tweaks in prior to 1.0, Jeff Trawick
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0, Jeff Trawick
- [PATCH] check NULL in apr_bucket_alloc, Jean-Jacques Clar
- Re: remaining issues prior to 1.0?, Stas Bekman
- Re: [patch: srclib/apr-util/misc/apr_date.c] fix datastring corruption, Stas Bekman
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0, Ben Collins-Sussman
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0, Jeff Trawick
- Re: apr_hook_global_pool is not initialized by apr_initialize, Stas Bekman
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0, Max Bowsher
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0, Jim Jagielski
- RE: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0, Sander Striker
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0, Cliff Woolley
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0, Jeff Trawick
- Re: [patch] sendfile on win32 slow (bug #20382), Maarten Bekers
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0, Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0, Jeff Trawick
- Re: [patch] sendfile on win32 slow (bug #20382), Bill Stoddard
- Re: apr_reslist question, Cliff Woolley
- Re: [patch] sendfile on win32 slow (bug #20382), Maarten Bekers
- Re: remaining issues prior to 1.0?, William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [Patch] IPv6 on Tru64 broken, Jeff Trawick
- Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/unix sockaddr.c, Joe Orton
- apr_reslist question, Balazs Mezodi
- Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/unix sockaddr.c, Colm MacCarthaigh
- Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/unix sockaddr.c, Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: remaining issues prior to 1.0?, Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0, Justin Erenkrantz
|
|