OSDir


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [users@httpd] Apache load balancer, etc


At this point nGinx, HAProxy, Lighthttpd seemed ~equivalent in speed. Apache was slower however, read repose to Jim's comment and questions ....




Apache

Nginx

HAProxy

Lighttpd

Alter Ratio of Traffic to Hosts

Yes

Yes

Yes

?

Send to 2 Hosts

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Implement Persistent Connection

Yes

Paid Only

Yes

Not Working

Handle HTTPS Connection

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Terminate SSL at Load Balancer

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Pass thru SSL Connection

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Fail2Ban Compatibility

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Pass X-Forwarded-For Value

Yes

Yes

Yes

?



From: knobisoft@xxxxxxxxx <knobisoft@xxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Martin Knoblauch <knobi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 9:27:47 AM
To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache load balancer, etc
 
Hi John,

 care to share pointers to those comparisons? Curious myself ...

Thanks
Martin

On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Rose, John B <jbrose@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Have been comparing  Apache load balancing with some other possibilities

As expected can do just about anything you want with Apache but the performance testing between Apache load balancing and nginx, haproxy, lighthttpd has Apache noticeably slower. 

Any tips on config tuning to optimize Apache load balancing performance?

Any comments on open source software load balancers you folks have used that you recommend?

Thanks

Sent from my iPad
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




--
------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch
email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de
www: http://www.knobisoft.de