[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

Wow - that's actually really cool! Thanks for sharing - would love to see a HOWTO.

Daniel Ruggeri

On 2018-09-19 14:59, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Le 18/09/2018 à 02:56, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit :
Hi, all;
    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:

I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.35:
[X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.

The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
md5: 92ddccfbd43b533578499d1faaad17fe *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz
sha1: b7996c2c1f7ff5bb217114fe5354a19a5207ab62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz
sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c


Ubuntu 18.04
gcc 8.1

I now build with gcc test-coverage options. Attached, the results on
my machine after a t/TEST.
I use a slightly modified version of the script I've updated for APR.
(don't pay attention to all the APR related text in the attached file

This gives the picture of what need more love in the test-framework. I
can share the corresponding .gcov files to see which lines are never
executed while running the tests.
This still need to be improved and I will post one day a How-To about it.

Based on it, I'll try to add some new test-cases to improve the test
coverage of the test-framework. (i.e. see my latest additions for
modules that were completely untested (reflector.t; allowmethods.t) or
some paths not tested (setenvif.t))
We'll never be able to test all possible combination, but the more
lines are executed at least one, the better it is.

Thx for RM