[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wherefor 2.4.36?

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:37 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is anyone else disappointed in the number of regressions in 2.4.35?

Is anyone else interested in releasing 2.4.36 promptly with no new features or enhancements which may cause 2.4.36 to be similarly unusable? Which backports or reversions of new code are still needed to get to that point?

s/2.4.36/2.4.35/; s/2.4.35/2.4.34/;

Sorry, I jumped over 2.4.34 so quickly after the chunking regression that my numbering is already out of whack.