A BOM could be definitely useful so we can have a consistent set of impls for a microprofile version.Separate repo seems relevant as well+1Le lun. 9 juil. 2018 à 09:32, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :Le lun. 9 juil. 2018 à 08:55, Mark Struberg <struberg@xxxxxxxx> a écrit :Or we have this as part of our site?Works for the site, not for the bomOr an examples project?This is not an example but a delivery IMHOOr having both in one?Yep, i'd put a new repo with both the site and the bom delivery since it would be about releases mainly, not "real" code.
> Am 09.07.2018 um 08:35 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Oops, forgot to mention it wpuld also host the site generation (aggregating all repo contents with antora)
> Le dim. 8 juil. 2018 21:14, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Hi guys,
> I'd like to formalize a bit more the "microprofile repo" discussion so I'm opening a new thread.
> The goal is the following one: get a repository where to put transversal code and provide a kind of "bom" or "starter" pom for users willing to get geronimo-microprofile-* at once.
> Originally it would just be one pom but I see it can evolve to manage N poms (one per MP version) and potentially some ASF servers enriched with the libs (to discuss later probably but it is to share what this repo can host).
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book