[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: website pointers

sounds good to me.
Do we have a blueprint which we can use as a base?

I'd suggest to still have the old site as backup to reference to.
But start adding our new projects to the new site.


On Monday, 19 March 2018, 10:41:15 CET, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi guys,

anyone able to help to rebrand the website?

I propose to use static generators for the "mainstream" projects and bind them under a subcontext using the project name (dropping geronimo prefix if used, ex: /safeguarad, /xbean, /config).

The root should contain the targets of the projects (umbrella goals) + asf standard stuff.

Now I'm not familiar enough with current site deployment to move alone forward.

So here are the questions:

1. anyone against it?
2. anyone able to help to start binding the new sites when available?

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau |  Blog | Old BlogGithub | LinkedIn | Book