[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Better way to clean up state when connect

Hi Xingcan,

Thanks for your response, to give your more background about my use case, I have Stream B with some split test name, and Stream A will be the actual test. I want to have Stream A connect to Stream B to figure out whether this test is still active or not. I am not sure this is the right way to do: My watermark is based on event time for 15 mins, OnTimer will be emit that records after 15 mins. I was wondering if there is way to purge the state of entire Stream B so I can get all the active test, since the file will include all the updated split testing name so I can refresh the lookup.

Also, I am not sure if I am using the right operator here, or if there is a way to share variable globally so I can just perform filter on stream A.
Please let me know your thoughts and thanks for you suggestions again.


On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 8:55 PM, Xingcan Cui <xingcanc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Chengzhi,

you said the Stream B which comes from a file will be updated unpredictably. I wonder if you could share more about how to judge an item (from Stream A I suppose) is not in the file and what watermark generation strategy did you choose?


> On May 12, 2018, at 12:48 AM, Chengzhi Zhao <w.zhaochengzhi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi there,
> I have a use case to check for active ID, there are two streams and I connect them: one has actual data (Stream A) and the other one is for lookup purpose (Stream B), I am getting Stream B as a file which includes all active ID, so inactive ID would not be show up on this list. I tried to use watermark to clean up the state of inactivate ID, but the Stream B updates is unpredictable so I want to keep everything in state until I found the item is not in that file any more.
> Please suggest what is the best way to implement it in flink. Thanks in advance for your help.
> Regards,
> Chengzhi