[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Using two different configurations for StreamExecutionEnvironment


Hi Chesnay

Thanks for the suggestion but this doesn’t sound like a good option, since I prefer local to remote debugging.

My question sounds like really common thing and the guys behind Flink should’ve think about it.

Of course I’m really new to the field of stream processing and maybe I don’t understand completely the processes here.




From: Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 2:34:31 PM
To: user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Using two different configurations for StreamExecutionEnvironment
I suggest to run jobs in the IDE only as tests. This allows you to use various Flink utilities to setup a cluster with your desired configuration, all while keeping these details out of the actual job code.

If you are using 1.5-SNAPSHOT, have a look at the MiniClusterResource class. The class can be used as a jUnit Rule and takes care of everything needed to run any job against the cluster it sets up internally.

For previous versions have your test class extend StreamingMultipleProgramsTestBase.

The test method would simply call the main method of your job.

On 09.05.2018 11:55, Georgi Stoyanov wrote:

Hi, folks


We have an Util that creates for us StreamExecutionEnvironment with some Checkpoint Configurations. The configuration for externalized checkpoints and state backend fails running of the job locally from IntelliJ. As a solution we currently comment those two configurations, but I don’t like that.
So far I found that I can just use ‘createLocalEnvoirment’ method but I still have no much ideas how to place it nicely in the existing logic (In the way that it doesn’t look like a hack)


If you have some ideas or know-how from your projects, please share them 😊


Kind Regards,