Re: [DISCUSS] [Contributing] (3) - Review Tooling
I opened a PR to extend the PR description template .
@jincheng sun <sunjincheng121@xxxxxxxxx>, I'd suggest to start a separate
discussion about a template for Jira ticket. Let's try to keep this thread
focused on the tooling to support the review process.
Am Do., 18. Okt. 2018 um 07:34 Uhr schrieb jincheng sun <
> I like @Fabian Hueske <fhueske@xxxxxxxxx> 's proposal, currently design
> template is pretty good idea. Because the template is convenient for
> contributors to follow the norms to community contributions. About
> templates, I think we also need an JIRA description template,
> In particular, in the case of current JIRA break previous users’ programs
> and setups, the contributions must describe them in detail in JIRA
> description. And we should make a discussion, get at least one Committed
> consensus in the JIRA discussion before dive into code.
> Stephan Ewen <sewen@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2018年9月21日周五 上午3:56写道：
> > Hi all!
> > This thread is dedicated to discuss the tooling we want to use for the
> > reviews.
> > It is spun out of the proposal *"A more structured approach to reviews
> > contributions".*
> > *Suggestions brought up so far*
> > *Use comments / template with checklist*
> > - Easy to do
> > - Manual, a bit of reviewer overhead, reviewers needs to know the
> > *Use a bot *
> > - Automatically add the review questions to each new PR
> > - Further details?
> > *Use GitHub labels*
> > - Searchable
> > - possibly not obvious to new contributors
> > - Any restrictions? Do members need to apply at ASF infra to have
> > permissions to edit github labels?