Re: MapState support for operator state
One challenge would be duplicate keys in this context.
Am Do., 4. Okt. 2018 um 10:17 Uhr schrieb Till Rohrmann <
> Hi Daniel,
> I don't think that there is a fundamental problem of having MapState
> available for operator state. First, there are some questions to be
> answered though: How do you union map state and how do you split map state
> in case of repartitioning. Once this has been answered one needs to
> implement the corresponding behaviour.
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 2:29 AM Dániel Berecz <bdaniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Hi everyone,
> > I would like to ask if there is any conceptual problem with having
> > available for operator states, or is it just a lack of implementation?
> > Best regards,
> > Daniel Berecz