Re: MapState support for operator state
I don't think that there is a fundamental problem of having MapState
available for operator state. First, there are some questions to be
answered though: How do you union map state and how do you split map state
in case of repartitioning. Once this has been answered one needs to
implement the corresponding behaviour.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 2:29 AM Dániel Berecz <bdaniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Hi everyone,
> I would like to ask if there is any conceptual problem with having MapState
> available for operator states, or is it just a lack of implementation?
> Best regards,
> Daniel Berecz