Re: [DISCUSS] [Contributing] (3) - Review Tooling
As a new contributor I cared about how to make my contribution accepted by the community, some questions:
1) When will it get reviewed? Is there a rule about review timeline?
2) There are long backlog of pull requests, What happened if a pull request not get noticed, do we have some mechanism to make it moving forward, like a pull request will be assigned a owner of reviewer? Or we have a review queue and a pull request will be get handled fairly.
> On Sep 20, 2018, at 12:56 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all!
> This thread is dedicated to discuss the tooling we want to use for the
> It is spun out of the proposal *"A more structured approach to reviews and
> *Suggestions brought up so far*
> *Use comments / template with checklist*
> - Easy to do
> - Manual, a bit of reviewer overhead, reviewers needs to know the process
> *Use a bot *
> - Automatically add the review questions to each new PR
> - Further details?
> *Use GitHub labels*
> - Searchable
> - possibly not obvious to new contributors
> - Any restrictions? Do members need to apply at ASF infra to have
> permissions to edit github labels?