Re: Cherry picking FLINK-9753 and FLINK-9753 on release-1.6
Thanks for the +1’s.
I added the relevant commits to the release-1.6 branch.
> On Jul 22, 2018, at 3:05 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrmann@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would be in favor of including FLINK-9903 and FLINK-9753 in Flink 1.6
> because they add more value for the user at a comparable small risk of
> breaking the system since it is a connector. So +1 for cherry picking these
> two commits.
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 6:16 PM Tony Wei <tony19920430@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Kostas,
>> Nice to see these features merged to the release-1.6 branch. Supporting
>> Parque format in StreamingFileSink
>> really makes me eager to apply it to some use cases in our company, but I'm
>> still wondering if the current
>> StreamingFileSink works well on S3 or I should wait util [FLINK-9752] done.
>> Anyway, I would still like to see this happen, because it let me have more
>> alternative to upload data with parquet
>> format. Thanks for your great efforts on this.
>> Best Regards,
>> Tony Wei
>> 2018-07-21 4:24 GMT+08:00 Kostas Kloudas <k.kloudas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> Hi all,
>>> We just merged on the master [FLINK-9753] (commit
>>> and [FLINK-9903] (commit b56c75ca375049b1d2c80d2d0945ae1ae04eb39e).
>>> These two commits introduce:
>>> 1) a big refactoring to the new StreamingFileSink which allows it to
>>> support bulk formats in general (FLINK-9753) and more expressive rolling
>>> and bucketing strategies, and
>>> 2) support for Parque, based on the previous refactoring.
>>> Both these features were pretty popular in the mailing list.
>>> Given that these 2 features are self contained, as they mainly affect a
>>> connector, we would like to cherry pick these commits to the release-1.6
>>> branch. But for this, we would like to have the OK from the community.
>>> Please let me know what you think,
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9903 <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9753 <