Re: Cherry picking FLINK-9753 and FLINK-9753 on release-1.6
I would be in favor of including FLINK-9903 and FLINK-9753 in Flink 1.6
because they add more value for the user at a comparable small risk of
breaking the system since it is a connector. So +1 for cherry picking these
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 6:16 PM Tony Wei <tony19920430@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Kostas,
> Nice to see these features merged to the release-1.6 branch. Supporting
> Parque format in StreamingFileSink
> really makes me eager to apply it to some use cases in our company, but I'm
> still wondering if the current
> StreamingFileSink works well on S3 or I should wait util [FLINK-9752] done.
> Anyway, I would still like to see this happen, because it let me have more
> alternative to upload data with parquet
> format. Thanks for your great efforts on this.
> Best Regards,
> Tony Wei
> 2018-07-21 4:24 GMT+08:00 Kostas Kloudas <k.kloudas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Hi all,
> > We just merged on the master [FLINK-9753] (commit
> > 66b1f854a0250bdd048808d40f93aa2990476841)
> > and [FLINK-9903] (commit b56c75ca375049b1d2c80d2d0945ae1ae04eb39e).
> > These two commits introduce:
> > 1) a big refactoring to the new StreamingFileSink which allows it to
> > support bulk formats in general (FLINK-9753) and more expressive rolling
> > and bucketing strategies, and
> > 2) support for Parque, based on the previous refactoring.
> > Both these features were pretty popular in the mailing list.
> > Given that these 2 features are self contained, as they mainly affect a
> > connector, we would like to cherry pick these commits to the release-1.6
> > branch. But for this, we would like to have the OK from the community.
> > Please let me know what you think,
> > Kostas
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9903 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9903>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9753 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9753>