回复：[DISCUSS] Release Flink 1.5.1
I have reviewed FLINK-9676, wish it merged soon.
发件人：Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@xxxxxxxxxx>
收件人：dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; wangzhijiang999 <wangzhijiang999@xxxxxxxxxx>; zjffdu <zjffdu@xxxxxxxxx>; Till Rohrmann <trohrmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
主 题：Re: [DISCUSS] Release Flink 1.5.1
Building the binary releases overnight failed due to a configuration
mistake on my side.
Till has informed me that FLINK-9676 might occur more often than we
A PR to address the issue was already opened by Nico.
Given that I have to restart the process anyway today I'm delaying the
release for a few hours
so we have a chance to get the fix in.
On 04.07.2018 11:21, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> Alrighty, looks like we're in agreement for a soon release.
> Let's take inventory of issues to still include:
> - [FLINK-9554] flink scala shell doesn't work in yarn mode
> I'm currently taking a look and will probably merge it by the end of
> - [FLINK-9676] Deadlock during canceling task and recycling exclusive
> Till is taking a look to gauge how critical/fixable it is; we may not
> fix it in this release.
> - [FLINK-9707] LocalFileSystem does not support concurrent directory
> Till opened a PR that I'm reviewing at the moment.
> - [FLINK-9693] Set Execution#taskRestore to null after deployment
> Till opened a PR, i guess i can take a look unless anyone else wants to.
> I will cut the release-branch this evening; this should be enough time
> to fix the above issues. (except maybe FLINK-9676 of course)
> On 02.07.2018 12:19, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>> it has been a little over a month since we've release 1.5.0. Since
>> then we've addressed 56 JIRAs  for the 1.5 branch, including
>> stability enhancement to the new execution mode (FLIP-6), fixes for
>> critical issues in the metric system, but also features that didn't
>> quite make it into 1.5.0 like FLIP-6 support for the scala-shell.
>> I think now is a good time to start thinking about a 1.5.1 release,
>> for which I would volunteer as the release manager.
>> There are a few issues that I'm aware of that we should include in
>> the release , but I believe these should be resolved within the
>> next days.
>> So that we don't overlap with with proposed 1.6 release  we
>> ideally start the release process this week.
>> What do you think?
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/versions/12343053
>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9280
>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8785
>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9567