[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Second question, is there any reason not to use syntactic sugar for distinctions between "multiply" and " multpliedBy"? With the former being the suger, if the latter is a better standard. It seems like both sides of the fence can be easily bridged here. On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 4:57 PM Eric Barnhill <ericbarnhill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 1:52 AM Stephen Colebourne <scolebourne@xxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> >> The order of the static constants is also strange - I'm sure a more >> logical order could be chosen. >> > > I have rearranged the constants into the order 0, 1, 1/2, 1/3, 2/3, 1/4, > 3/4 . I propose dropping the constants > for fifths and negative one. One needs to draw the line somewhere > reasonable. Any objections? >

- Prev by Date:
**Re: [numbers] Making fractions VALJOs** - Next by Date:
**Re: [vfs] new http4 provider, not replace http?** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [numbers] Making fractions VALJOs** - Next by thread:
**Re: [numbers] Making fractions VALJOs** - Index(es):