Re: [DBCP] Abandoned trace should use CopyOnWriteArrayList instead of custom sync
org.apache.commons.dbcp2.AbandonedTrace.getTrace() is a protected method
which folks might be calling from custom subclasses. So if we did change
the internal representation we might have to do a conversion to support
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:13 AM Gary Gregory <garydgregory@xxxxxxxxx>
> A CopyOnWriteArrayList won't work since it does not support remove()...
> but the idea is to replace the ArrayList with a java.utl.concurrent
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:05 AM Gary Gregory <garydgregory@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Hi All and Phil:
>> In [DBCP] Abandoned trace we use an Array with synchronized blocks.
>> Should we replace this usage with a CopyOnWriteArrayList and no custom