[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [compress] High Level API for Archives

> > As in one module/jar per implementation. One module for a zipfs, one for
> an
> > sshfs, etc., instead of just "commons-vfs" as a monolith with optional
> > dependencies.

Just one question: Why?

The implementation jars for compress would be tiny and would have close to
none dependencies.