osdir.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Discuss [VOTE] Migrate Commons Weaver to Git



Am 20.04.2018 um 19:08 schrieb Matt Sicker:
> Wow, us "legacy" projects really need to keep up to date with these
> requirements. GitBox, no CMS (I think we're using svnpubsub everywhere, but
> this could also use gitpubsub with an asf-site branch), etc.

Would it reduce overhead if we converted multiple components at once?

I would like to move with [configuration] to git, but have hesitated so
far because I do not know the process in detail and what the effort is.

Oliver

> 
> On 20 April 2018 at 10:13, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> As Emmanuel suggested, Daniel Gruno confirmed for me that "git-wip is
>> slowly being deprecated." So the answer to the question initially posed by
>> Ralph would seem in fact to be gitbox.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:57 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibucau@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Gitbox is easier to use with github which makes contribs easier.
>> Otherwise
>>> you dont see much difference as a git user.
>>>
>>> Le 20 avr. 2018 00:16, "Emmanuel Bourg" <ebourg@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Le 20/04/2018 à 00:12, sebb a écrit :
>>>>> I suggest asking Infra whether they are both going to be supported
>>>> longer term.
>>>>
>>>> FWIW when I migrated JEXL I had no other choice than using Gitbox. I'm
>>>> not sure Infra still accepts new git-wip repositories.
>>>>
>>>> Emmanuel Bourg
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx