Re: Multiple Physical Networks in Basic Networking (KVM)
Wido / Ivan – I’m probably missing something – but is the feature you are looking for not the same functionality we currently have in “advanced zones with security groups”?
On 08/06/2018, 14:14, "Ivan Kudryavtsev" <kudryavtsev_ia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Wido, I also very interested in similar deployment, especially combined
with the capability of setting different network bandwidth for different
10.0.0.0/8 intra dc with 1g bandwidth per vm and white ipv4/ipv6 with
regular bandwidth management. But it seem it takes very big redesign of VM
settings and VR redesign is also required.
When I tried to investigate if it possible with ACS basic network, didn't
succeed with any relevant information.
пт, 8 июн. 2018 г., 14:56 Wido den Hollander <wido@xxxxxxxxx>:
> I am looking into supporting multiple Physical Networks inside onze
> Basic Networking zone.
> First: The reason we use Basic Networking is the simplicity and the fact
> that our (Juniper) routers can do the routing and not the VR.
> ALL our VMs have external IPv4/IPv6 addresses and we do not use NAT
> But right now a Hypervisor has a single VLAN/POD going to it terminated
> on 'cloudbr0' using vlan://untagged.
> But to better utilize our physical hardware it would be great it Basic
> Networking would support multiple physical networks using VLAN separation.
> For example:
> - PhysicalNetwork1: VLAN 100
> - PhysicalNetwork2: VLAN 101
> - PhysicalNetwork3: VLAN 102
> I've been looking into DirectAttached with Advanced Networking, but I
> couldn't find any reference to it on how that exactly works.
> Right now for our use-case Basic Networking with multiple Physical
> Networks would work best for us.
> Has anybody looked at this or has any insight of the problems we might
> run in to?
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK