It’s a little bit tricky in our particular situation. Allow me to explain:
As you are likely aware, the CloudStack Collaboration Conference will be held as a track in the larger ApacheCon conference in Montreal this coming September.
It is true, as you say, that anyone who wishes to do so can contribute to reviewing the CFP for ApacheCon.
What is a bit of a concern, however, is that we might get certain CloudStack CFP proposals vetoed by people who are not, per se, a part of our community.
That being the case, I have contacted the organizers for ApacheCon to see if there is some way we can section off the CloudStack CFP from the larger ApacheCon CFP for review purposes.
Assuming we can do this, the panel that I am proposing here would handle this review task.
I hope that helps clarify the situation.
On 3/30/18, 8:38 AM, "Rafael Weingärtner" <rafaelweingartner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Are we going to have a separated review process?
I thought anybody could go here  and apply for a reviewer position and
start reviewing. Well, that is what I did. I have already reviewed some
CloudStack proposals (of course I did not review mines). After asking to
review presentations, Rich has giving me access to the system. I thought
everybody interest in helping was going to do the same.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:05 AM, Swen - swen.io <me@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> I can help sort through presentations.
> Best regards,
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:Mike.Tutkowski@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. März 2018 21:40
> An: dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: Committee to Sort through CCC Presentation Submissions
> Hi everyone,
> As you may be aware, this coming September in Montreal, the CloudStack
> Community will be hosting the CloudStack Collaboration Conference:
> Even though the event is six months away, we are on a tight schedule with
> regards to the Call For Participation (CFP):
> If you are interested in submitting a talk, please do so before March 30th.
> That being said, as usual, we will have need of a small committee to sort
> through these presentation submissions.
> If you are interested in helping out in this process, please reply to this