OSDir


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dockerizing Cloudstack package builders


Thanks for the feedback Wido.

I, personally, wouldn't put them in *cloudstack* repo itself, since these
are complementary tools. To me it would
make more sense to put them under apache/ namespace on GitHub as we already
have bunch of apache/cloudstack-*
repos. And under apache/ or cloudstackl/ namespace on Docker Hub (whichever
makes more sense).

If community agrees with going forward with this proposal, I would be more
than happy to transfer ownership of
the GH and DH repos I created.

That's actually a great point. I was assuming these are going to be used by
only developers/maintainers which have

the source code at their disposals. I'm gonna wait for others
feedback/suggestions before enhancing this though.

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Wido den Hollander <wido@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
> On 03/26/2018 06:21 PM, Khosrow Moossavi wrote:
> > Hi community
> >
> > To make building Cloudstack's RPM or DEB packages more easily, portable
> and
> > reduce the need to
> > have a *correct* hardware to build them, I've Dockerized them. This is
> > essentially a follow up of what
> > Wido had done (only for deb packages though).
> >
>
> Very nice! I didn't have the time to work on this, but it kept popping
> up. I'd love to have a automated builder on download.cloudstack.org
> which does this for us automatically.
>
> > The proposed Builders can be found here[1] and here[2] on Github and
> > here[3] and here[4] on Docker Hub.
> >
>
> Cool!
>
> > I would appreciate it if you can give your feedback of them and if need
> be,
> > promote them on the official wiki/doc/repo.
> >
>
> Getting them on a official repo should be possible I think, we could put
> them in the /packaging directory of our main repo. Or maybe request a
> second repo called 'cloudstack-docker' or something.
>
> Right now I see that your builder wants to have the cloudstack source
> ready to be used (just as I did), but how about adding the option where
> it downloads a tarball from the website if no source and just a version
> is provided? Or it can do a git clone from Github and check out a
> specific tag/version.
>
> Again, very much appreciated!
>
> Wido
>
> > [1]: https://github.com/khos2ow/cloudstack-rpm-builder
> > [2]: https://github.com/khos2ow/cloudstack-deb-builder
> > [3]: https://hub.docker.com/r/khos2ow/cloudstack-deb-builder/
> > [4]: https://hub.docker.com/r/khos2ow/cloudstack-rpm-builder/
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Khosrow Moossavi
> >
> > Cloud Infrastructure Developer
> >
> > t 514.447.3456
> >
> > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
> >
>