Re: ByteOrdered partitioner when using sha-1 as partition key
Probably best to avoid bop even if you are aflready hashing keys yourself. What do you do when checksuma collide? It is possible right?
On Saturday, February 11, 2017, Micha <micha-1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
my table has a sha-1 sum as partition key. Would in this case the
ByteOrdered partitioner be a better choice than the Murmur3partitioner,
since the keys are quite random?
Sorry this was sent from mobile. Will do less grammar and spell check than usual.