LOL They took down that image finally!! But I would still keep an eye on what kind of fake benchmarks they might come up with.On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Amit Trivedi <triamit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:It indeed is a marketing gimmick. By clubbing Cassandra with likes of HBase that favors consistency over availability, points under cons section are all true, just not true when applied to any one database from that group.
Thanks and Regards
On Feb 7, 2017, 7:32 AM -0500, j.kesten@xxxxxxxxxxx, wrote:
Deeper inside there is a diagram:
They compare to NoSQL along with Riak, HBase and Cassandra.
Of course you CAN have a Cassandra cluster which is not fully available with loss of a dc nor consistent.
Gesendet von meinem Windows 10 Phone