osdir.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [VOTE] Accept GoCQL driver donation and begin incubation process


My +1 was under the assumption that the current maintainer wanted to continue with the project and would be brought in to do that along with the code.

But my +1 also has no meaning in the ASF meritocracy as I am neither a committer or a PMC member ;).  It just expresses my opinion as a long standing member of the community that I think it is fine to bring the current GoCQL driver and its main contributors into the Apache Cassandra project.  I was not asking others to do the work, I was assuming the current people doing the work on said driver would continue to work on it.

-Jeremiah

> On Sep 12, 2018, at 12:55 PM, Jonathan Haddad <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I'm +0, and I share the same concerns as Sylvain.
> 
> For those of you that have +1'ed, are you planning on contributing to the
> driver?  Docs, code, QA?  It's easy to throw a +1 down to make the driver
> the responsibility of the project if you're asking others to do the work.
> I vote this way because I already know I won't contribute to it and it's
> irresponsible to vote something in if I have no intent on helping maintain
> it.
> 
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:45 AM Sumanth Pasupuleti
> <spasupuleti@xxxxxxxxxxx.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:37 AM Dinesh Joshi
>> <dinesh.joshi@xxxxxxxxx.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> Dinesh
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 12, 2018, at 10:23 AM, Jaydeep Chovatia <
>>> chovatia.jaydeep@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:00 AM Roopa Tangirala
>>>> <rtangirala@xxxxxxxxxxx.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> *Regards,*
>>>>> 
>>>>> *Roopa Tangirala*
>>>>> 
>>>>> Engineering Manager CDE
>>>>> 
>>>>> *(408) 438-3156 - mobile*
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:51 AM Sylvain Lebresne <lebresne@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> -0
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The project seems to have a hard time getting on top of reviewing his
>>>>>> backlog
>>>>>> of 'patch available' issues, so that I'm skeptical adopting more code
>>> to
>>>>>> maintain is the thing the project needs the most right now. Besides,
>>> I'm
>>>>>> also
>>>>>> generally skeptical that augmenting the scope of a project makes it
>>>>> better:
>>>>>> I feel
>>>>>> keeping this project focused on the core server is better. I see
>> risks
>>>>>> here, but
>>>>>> the upsides haven't been made very clear for me, even for end users:
>>> yes,
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> may provide a tiny bit more clarity around which Golang driver to
>>> choose
>>>>> by
>>>>>> default, but I'm not sure users are that lost, and I think there is
>>> other
>>>>>> ways to
>>>>>> solve that if we really want.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Anyway, I reckon I may be overly pessimistic here and it's not that
>>>>> strong
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> an objection if a large majority is on-board, so giving my opinion
>> but
>>>>> not
>>>>>> opposing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sylvain
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:36 PM Jeremiah D Jordan <
>>>>>> jeremiah.jordan@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But I also think getting this through incubation might take a
>> while/be
>>>>>>> impossible given how large the contributor list looks…
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2018, at 10:22 AM, Jeff Jirsa <jjirsa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> (Incubation looks like it may be challenging to get acceptance from
>>>>> all
>>>>>>> existing contributors, though)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jeff Jirsa
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2018, at 8:12 AM, Nate McCall <zznate.m@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> This will be the same process used for dtest. We will need to walk
>>>>>>>>> this through the incubator per the process outlined here:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__incubator.apache.org_guides_ip-5Fclearance.html&d=DwIFAg&c=adz96Xi0w1RHqtPMowiL2g&r=CNZK3RiJDLqhsZDG6FQGnXn8WyPRCQhp4x_uBICNC0g&m=g-MlYFZVJ7j5Dj_ZfPfa0Ik8Nxco7QsJhTG1TnJH7xI&s=rk5T_t1HZY6PAhN5XgflBhfEtNrcZkVTIvQxixDlw9o&e=
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Pending the outcome of this vote, we will create the JIRA issues
>> for
>>>>>>>>> tracking and after we go through the process, and discuss adding
>>>>>>>>> committers in a separate thread (we need to do this atomically
>>>>> anyway
>>>>>>>>> per general ASF committer adding processes).
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> -Nate
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jon Haddad
> http://www.rustyrazorblade.com
> twitter: rustyrazorblade


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx