osdir.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Roadmap for 4.0


Seems to me we should put September first to an official vote so we can
finish up with this mess.

On 13 April 2018 at 02:27, Rahul Singh <rahul.xavier.singh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I can commit some resources on my team - especially as we onboard some of
> our summer apprentices.
>
> I have some proprietary stress tools geared for Cassandra read / writes
> that are a little better and creates a little more realistic data than
> Cassandra stress.
>
> --
> Rahul Singh
> rahul.singh@xxxxxxxx
>
> Anant Corporation
>
> On Apr 12, 2018, 3:41 PM -0400, Nate McCall <zznate.m@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
> > Ok. So who's willing to test 4.0 on June 2nd? Let's start a sign up.
> >
> > We (tlp) will put some resources on this via going through some canned
> > scenarios we have internally. We aren't in a position to test data
> validity
> > (yet) but we can do a lot around cluster behavior.
> >
> > Who else has specific stuff they are willing to do? Even if it's just
> > tee'ing prod traffic, that would be hugely valuable.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 6:15 AM Jeff Jirsa <jjirsa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Jonathan Haddad <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > It sounds to me (please correct me if I'm wrong) like Jeff is arguing
> > > that
> > > > releasing 4.0 in 2 months isn't worth the effort of evaluating it,
> > > because
> > > > it's a big task and there's not enough stuff in 4.0 to make it
> > > worthwhile.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > More like "not enough stuff in 4.0 to make it worthwhile for the
> people I
> > > personally know to be willing and able to find the weird bugs".
> > >
> > >
> > > > If that is the case, I'm not quite sure how increasing the surface
> area
> > > of
> > > > changed code which needs to be vetted is going to make the process
> any
> > > > easier.
> > >
> > >
> > > It changes the interest level of at least some of the people able to
> > > properly test it from "not willing" to "willing".
> > >
> > > Totally possible that there exist people who are willing and able to
> find
> > > and fix those bugs, who just haven't committed to it in this thread.
> That's
> > > probably why Sankalp keeps asking who's actually willing to do the
> testing
> > > on June 2 - if nobody's going to commit to doing real testing on June
> 2,
> > > all we're doing is adding inconvenience to those of us who'd be
> willing to
> > > do it later in the year.
> > >
>