[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
DynamicRouter annotation with Consume annotation -- still need a route to consume messages?
Hello, everyone. I am using camel 2.19.2. If I have a class like this:
public class MyDynamicRouter {
@DynamicRouter
@Consume(uri = "direct-vm:start")
public String route() {
... routing logic goes here ...
}
}
Do I still need to add a route that consumes from "direct-vm:start"? It
seems like I still need the route, since if I eliminate the route, and add
a bean (like the sparse example above) to the registry within the camel
context like this:
void initialize() {
this.simpleRegistry = new SimpleRegistry();
this.camelContext = new DefaultCamelContext(registry);
this.camelContext.start();
registry.put("myDynamicRouter", new MyDynamicRouter());
}
If I try to send something to "direct-vm:start", I get an error that
nothing is consuming from that endpoint. If this is expected behavior,
then what is the point of adding the @Consume annotation to the dynamic
router method? The route that uses this bean is consuming from that
endpoint anyway because of from("direct-vm:start").
Thanks in advance.