osdir.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [CAMEL 3] Moving sandbox/camel-3.x to master


+1

---
Luca Burgazzoli

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:44 PM Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:32 PM Andrea Cosentino <ancosen1985@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > If it works for everyone the next steps should be:
> >
> > - On Wednesday morning I'll send an email with an alert about the creation of 2.x branch from master
> > - I'll move sanbox/camel-3.x to master shortly after pushing 2.x
> >
> > Does this work for all? Thoughts?
> >
>
> +1
>
>
> > --
> > Andrea Cosentino
> > ----------------------------------
> > Apache Camel PMC Chair
> > Apache Karaf Committer
> > Apache Servicemix PMC Member
> > Email: ancosen1985@xxxxxxxxx
> > Twitter: @oscerd2
> > Github: oscerd
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Friday, December 14, 2018, 3:01:01 PM GMT+1, Andrea Cosentino <ancosen1985@xxxxxxxxx.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Sure. Let me open a different one.
> >
> > --
> > Andrea Cosentino
> > ----------------------------------
> > Apache Camel PMC Chair
> > Apache Karaf Committer
> > Apache Servicemix PMC Member
> > Email: ancosen1985@xxxxxxxxx
> > Twitter: @oscerd2
> > Github: oscerd
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Friday, December 14, 2018, 2:59:22 PM GMT+1, Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Can we please move the discussion about Java 8 and 11 to another
> > thread, and keep this focused on the subj.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 2:34 AM Willem Jiang <willem.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > I think for the average the enterprise JDK user they may still use JDK
> > > 8 for a long time.
> > > If we start the Camel 3.x, we still need to maintain the Camel 2.x
> > > branch for a while.
> > > It could be great, if we can provide a roadmap of JDK8 support time,
> > >
> > > BTW,  Spring has good backward compatibility for JDK 6,7,8[1]
> > > It could be useful if we can still provide the backward compatibility
> > > in Camel 3.x and if we cannot do that we need to drop a line for it.
> > >
> > > [1]https://spring.io/blog/2015/04/03/how-spring-achieves-compatibility-with-java-6-7-and-8
> > >
> > > Willem Jiang
> > >
> > > Twitter: willemjiang
> > > Weibo: 姜宁willem
> > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 3:19 PM Andrea Cosentino
> > > <ancosen1985@xxxxxxxxx.invalid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You're right, but if we always think about how much effort is needed to switch to a new and different JDK, we will never move from JDK 8.
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to have other feedback on this by the way.
> > > >
> > > > For the compatibility matrix we need to it to the documentation too.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andrea Cosentino
> > > > ----------------------------------
> > > > Apache Camel PMC Chair
> > > > Apache Karaf Committer
> > > > Apache Servicemix PMC Member
> > > > Email: ancosen1985@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > Twitter: @oscerd2
> > > > Github: oscerd
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, December 13, 2018, 8:14:04 AM GMT+1, Onder SEZGIN <onders@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Almost +1, (as points below affects the idea of where to using any camel versions and even contributing because for example;
> > > > if you use (let's say JDK 8) and have come across a problem and solved in your local branch 2.X and submitted and if Camel 3.X would require JDK 10 as the base minimum version, it will create a regression effort, in terms of building and executing on JDK 10. would it slow down the contribution efforts? )
> > > >
> > > > Can we also discuss the matters of compatibility matrix? Maybe having one like in starters guide or in some other document.
> > > > I know we have pages [1] [2]
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://camel.apache.org/what-are-the-dependencies.html
> > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/master/docs/user-manual/en/camel-jar-dependencies.adoc
> > > >
> > > > Having such matrix considering other integration platforms would be helpful IMHO.
> > > > Such as Spring Boot, Karaf, CDI etcs...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 3:12 PM Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:11 PM Andrea Cosentino <ancosen1985@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> It makes sense to set a date.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Once we checked the documentation and resolved doubts,
> > > > >> I propose Wed 19th Dec in the morning.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Does it work for all?
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > >> Thanks.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Andrea Cosentino
> > > > >> ----------------------------------
> > > > >> Apache Camel PMC Chair
> > > > >> Apache Karaf Committer
> > > > >> Apache Servicemix PMC Member
> > > > >> Email: ancosen1985@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > >> Twitter: @oscerd2
> > > > >> Github: oscerd
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Wednesday, December 12, 2018, 1:09:05 PM GMT+1, Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:14 PM Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Sounds good to me.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Fwiw, I've been working on the camel build those past days, trying to
> > > > >> > improve things a bit.  I'll report when I have something in a correct shape.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> What if we set a date when we make the change? For example Friday 14th
> > > > >> December or Monday 17th eg?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> And we would need to update the contributing document
> > > > >> with a section about that Camel 2.x is now located in the 2.x branch,
> > > > >> and that master is for 3.x.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I wonder if this change will affect the current release procedure of
> > > > >> Camel 2.x? For example when we need to do next round of patch releases
> > > > >> for 2.x and also the new 2.24.0 release,
> > > > >> is there something we need to update our release guides at
> > > > >> http://camel.apache.org/release-guide.html
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Gregor if you are listening, is there something on-top-of your head
> > > > >> you can think of?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Guillaume
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Le mer. 12 déc. 2018 à 11:54, Andrea Cosentino
> > > > >> > <ancosen1985@xxxxxxxxx.invalid> a écrit :
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Hello,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Since we started work of some cleanup about Camel 3 and it's already
> > > > >> > > aligned with master, I'd like to ask what do you think about switching the
> > > > >> > > master to 3.x and create a 2.x branch for the activities on Camel 2.x..
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > What do you think about this?
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Thanks
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > --
> > > > >> > > Andrea Cosentino
> > > > >> > > ----------------------------------
> > > > >> > > Apache Camel PMC Chair
> > > > >> > > Apache Karaf Committer
> > > > >> > > Apache Servicemix PMC Member
> > > > >> > > Email: ancosen1985@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > >> > > Twitter: @oscerd2
> > > > >> > > Github: oscerd
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > --
> > > > >> > ------------------------
> > > > >> > Guillaume Nodet
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Claus Ibsen
> > > > >> -----------------
> > > > >> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> > > > >> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
> >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Claus Ibsen
> > > > > -----------------
> > > > > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> > > > > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
> > > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Claus Ibsen
> > -----------------
> > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2