osdir.com


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18


I think we should consider releasing new versions of Calcite and Avatica soon, especially with the Thanksgiving holiday in North America and Christmas + New Year later in December/January coming up.

Am I correct to assume that we need to release Avatica 1.13.0 before Calcite 1.18.0?

If so, I am able to be release manager for Avatica if no one else is interested.

On 21/10/2018 6:13 PM, Michael Mior wrote:
Thanks for continuing to push releases forward! Unfortunately I won't be
able to volunteer to be release manager this time around, but I'll try to
set aside some time to go through some PRs.

On Sat, Oct 20, 2018, 02:21 Julian Hyde <jhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

OK, it's now exactly 3 months since 1.17. I think it's time. I think
we should aim for a first RC a week from today (Friday 26th October).

Can we have a volunteer to be release manager?

Also, there are lots of PRs to review and merge. Please help out with
that task, committers.

Julian



On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 11:00 AM Julian Hyde <jhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We’ll be sure to get PRs into the release. If you like, you can make the
JIRA case depend on those 3 cases - that will remind us.
(Other contributors: You can do that also, but only if you have a PR
that you believe is ready to submit.)
On Sep 20, 2018, at 8:18 AM, Andrew Pilloud
<apilloud@xxxxxxxxxx.INVALID> wrote:
Beam has a few JIRAs we'd like to see make the next release (which will
enable us to replace 11k lines of code with calls to Calcite). They all
have open PRs.

* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2404 Accessing
structured-types is not implemented by the runtime
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2529 linq4j should
promote
integer to floating point when generating function calls
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2571 TRIM does not
match
the behavior of most SQL implementations

Andrew

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 6:38 PM Kevin Risden <krisden@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
9/25 should be the GA release of JDK 11 according to [1]. Would be
good to
ensure that the next release is compatible with it. We should be in
good
shape but would be a good release note too.

1. http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/11/

Kevin Risden

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 20:56 Francis Chuang <francischuang@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

For avatica, there are currently 6 open PRs. A few of them appear to
be
blocked due to incompatibilities with JDK or something else. Perhaps
the
situation has now changed and we can get those in for 1.13.

On 20/09/2018 9:26 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
I have logged

* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2576 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2576> Release Avatica
1.13
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2575 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2575> Release Calcite
1.18.0



On Sep 19, 2018, at 4:19 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Calcite 1.17 was released on 20th July (2 months ago) and since
then
there have been almost 100 commits.
Does anyone have constraints on when 1.18 should be released? (My
opinion: we should aim for 3 months after 1.17, and therefore we will
need
an RC before 10th October.)
Does anyone have any JIRA cases that they would like to get into
1.18
but they have not yet finished?
Who would like to be release manager?

Do we need a new Avatica release before we make this Calcite
release?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2467 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2467> describes one
reason
to do so: jetty versions. Also, it would be nice if both projects
used
the
new parent POM (see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2486 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2486>) but it’s not
essential.
Julian