Re: CALCITE-2458 Use of Kotlin for unit tests
Since this is an Apache project, we should use the Apache definition of
"lazy consensus." (
> A decision-making policy which assumes general consent if no responses
are posted within a defined period.
Per this definition, I agree with Julian that lazy consensus was *not*
reached on this decision. You're correct that there were no -1 votes, but
there were responses, some with reasonable objections.
Le mar. 25 sept. 2018 à 10:08, Vladimir Sitnikov <
sitnikov.vladimir@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Julian>You said upfront you were going to use lazy consensus.
> I'm afraid I fail to understand what do you mean by consensus.
> It would probably help if you provided a definition of "consensus being
> reached" vs "consensus not being reached".
> We can't (and shouldn't) wait forever for some unknown future opinions.
> I see "in-doubt" replies, however I don't see "-1" votes.
> CALCITE-2458 was created on August, 8.
> It is more than enough to collect objections.