Re: CALCITE-2458 Use of Kotlin for unit tests
You said upfront you were going to use lazy consensus. The discussion didn’t reach consensus. You went ahead anyway.
> On Sep 25, 2018, at 2:12 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The following is for the reference purposes, and there's not a single
> intend to accuse anybody of doing something (e.g. miscalculations or
> My calculations might be off so please correct me if you think that is
> 1) Calcite includes 16 committers + 19 PMC. Most of them were silent.
> 2) http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/calcite-dev/201809.mbox/thread?2
> shows (as of time when I create this message) that the thread has 14
> messages 5 of which were generated by me
> 3) Apache voting (see
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification )
> explicitly recommends to use whole numbers for voting on code modifications.
> 4) No-one killed a proposal with a veto
> 5) Most of replies were around +-0, except Michael who was +0.5 and Jacques
> who was -0.9 (note that he explicitly declares he does not veto the change)
> To my best knowledge:
> Michael Mior +0.5 (binding)
> Laurent Goujon -0 (binding)
> Enrico Olivelli -0
> Jacques Nadeau -0.9 (binding)
> Vladimir Sitnikov ++1 (binding)
> 6) I'm sure we don't really want to discuss this. I suggest we don't spend
> time on splitting hairs here.
> Apparently there's not that many people who care enough to spend time on
> this discussion.