osdir.com


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18


We’ll be sure to get PRs into the release. If you like, you can make the JIRA case depend on those 3 cases - that will remind us.

(Other contributors: You can do that also, but only if you have a PR that you believe is ready to submit.)

> On Sep 20, 2018, at 8:18 AM, Andrew Pilloud <apilloud@xxxxxxxxxx.INVALID> wrote:
> 
> Beam has a few JIRAs we'd like to see make the next release (which will
> enable us to replace 11k lines of code with calls to Calcite). They all
> have open PRs.
> 
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2404 Accessing
> structured-types is not implemented by the runtime
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2529 linq4j should promote
> integer to floating point when generating function calls
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2571 TRIM does not match
> the behavior of most SQL implementations
> 
> Andrew
> 
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 6:38 PM Kevin Risden <krisden@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> 9/25 should be the GA release of JDK 11 according to [1]. Would be good to
>> ensure that the next release is compatible with it. We should be in good
>> shape but would be a good release note too.
>> 
>> 1. http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/11/
>> 
>> Kevin Risden
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 20:56 Francis Chuang <francischuang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> For avatica, there are currently 6 open PRs. A few of them appear to be
>>> blocked due to incompatibilities with JDK or something else. Perhaps the
>>> situation has now changed and we can get those in for 1.13.
>>> 
>>> On 20/09/2018 9:26 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>> I have logged
>>>> 
>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2576 <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2576> Release Avatica 1.13
>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2575 <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2575> Release Calcite
>> 1.18.0
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 19, 2018, at 4:19 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Calcite 1.17 was released on 20th July (2 months ago) and since then
>>> there have been almost 100 commits.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Does anyone have constraints on when 1.18 should be released? (My
>>> opinion: we should aim for 3 months after 1.17, and therefore we will
>> need
>>> an RC before 10th October.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Does anyone have any JIRA cases that they would like to get into 1.18
>>> but they have not yet finished?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Who would like to be release manager?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do we need a new Avatica release before we make this Calcite release?
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2467 <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2467> describes one reason
>>> to do so: jetty versions. Also, it would be nice if both projects used
>> the
>>> new parent POM (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2486 <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2486>) but it’s not
>>> essential.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Julian
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>