osdir.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18


9/25 should be the GA release of JDK 11 according to [1]. Would be good to
ensure that the next release is compatible with it. We should be in good
shape but would be a good release note too.

1. http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/11/

Kevin Risden

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 20:56 Francis Chuang <francischuang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> For avatica, there are currently 6 open PRs. A few of them appear to be
> blocked due to incompatibilities with JDK or something else. Perhaps the
> situation has now changed and we can get those in for 1.13.
>
> On 20/09/2018 9:26 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> > I have logged
> >
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2576 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2576> Release Avatica 1.13
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2575 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2575> Release Calcite 1.18.0
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Sep 19, 2018, at 4:19 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Calcite 1.17 was released on 20th July (2 months ago) and since then
> there have been almost 100 commits.
> >>
> >> Does anyone have constraints on when 1.18 should be released? (My
> opinion: we should aim for 3 months after 1.17, and therefore we will need
> an RC before 10th October.)
> >>
> >> Does anyone have any JIRA cases that they would like to get into 1.18
> but they have not yet finished?
> >>
> >> Who would like to be release manager?
> >>
> >> Do we need a new Avatica release before we make this Calcite release?
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2467 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2467> describes one reason
> to do so: jetty versions. Also, it would be nice if both projects used the
> new parent POM (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2486 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2486>) but it’s not
> essential.
> >>
> >> Julian
> >>
> >
>
>