[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ElasticSearch Adapters. Calcite vs Dremio

I don't know Dremio, but I guess the ES adpater parts were just implemented independently to be able to get something faster. If the authors of Dremio want to contribute back we'd definitely integrate such work.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
*Christian Beikov*
Am 17.05.2018 um 13:56 schrieb Michael Mior:
It's my understanding that while Dremio plugins serve a similar purpose,
they are different from Calcite adapters. In any case, it could be worth
looking at what Dremiois doing to see if there are any useful features to
pull into Calcite.

Michael Mior

Le jeu. 17 mai 2018 à 00:28, Andrei Sereda <andrei@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :


I've noticed that Dremio implemented
their own (calcite) adapters for ElasticSearch.

According to documentation
<https://www.dremio.com/tutorials/unlocking-sql-on-elasticsearch/> those
adapters support ES aggregations (lacking in calcite) plus more advanced
features like date ranges or native scripting
Is there a reason they're not backported / used in calcite ?  More
specifically is there any (technical) reason for those plugins to be
developed independently ?

Thanks in advance,