osdir.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [VOTE] Release Vendored gRPC 1.13.1 v0.2, release candidate #1


Does this imply that we need a subsequent full release afterwards?
I am assuming this new release is related to the reported issues with
the dataflow worker or is this something different?

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 2:51 AM Kenneth Knowles <kenn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>  - sigs good
>  - `jar tf` looks good
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 7:54 PM Scott Wegner <swegner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the vendored artifact gRPC 1.13.1 v0.2
>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This is a follow-up to the previous thread about vendoring updates [1]
>>
>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [2],
>> * commit hash "3b8abca3ca3352e6bf20e059f17324049a2eae0a" [3],
>> * artifacts which are signed with the key with fingerprint
>> 5F47BD54C52008007288FF4D3593BA6C25ABF71F [4]
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Scott
>>
>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9a55d12000cb3b1b61620b7dc4009d1351e6b8c70951f70aeb358583@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> [2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1055/
>> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7328
>> [4] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Got feedback? tinyurl.com/swegner-feedback